Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 10:24:43 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 12:39:28, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On March 28, 2002 at 01:53:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On March 27, 2002 at 15:14:14, pavel wrote: >> >>>On March 27, 2002 at 05:41:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>IF GM Gulko play another match of 6 games against either Deep Fritz, Deep >>>>Junior or Deep Shredder in standard time control; I will bet on GM Gulko to win, >>>>even if they use a Quad or the best Dual AMD MP. >>> >>>If Gm Gulko would play another set of games. >>>If Gm Gulko would Play all the games as white >>>If Gm Gulko has a good day. >>>If GM Gulko can spend more time with these programs prepering. >>>If Gm Gulko havent lost his lucky charm "horse shoe". >>>If the sky would fall on the head of the computer operators. >>>If Computer program had a bad opening line >>>If the operator of the program made a mistake... >>> >>> >>>If these things would happen I am preety sure Gm Gulko would have a good chance >>>of winning. >>> >>>Any more "If's"? >>> >>>pavs >> >> >>Very funny, but the point here is that GM Gulko would gain more in standard time >>control than any of these programs would by doubling speed. >> >>Pichard > >If my memory doesn't fail was a Gulko's choice the match timings, and if he >chose that timing I guess he was comfortable enough with it. You people do not get it. Gulko most probably chose this timimg because it is less time to waste = less energy = less work. I do not think it is because he would feel more comfortable. Otherwise, he would have required to play only 3-4 games a week or something. He is not giving excuses and probably he does not care. The match is interesting, period. But do not say that the conditions are good for the GM just because he chose that. If you offer 10 million bucks to a GM if they defeat the computer, they would chose a pace as low as possible and a match as long as possible (less than 24 games maybe) with plenty of breaks and 6 months to prepare. In other words, what it has been done in WC, traditionally. They do not choose that because nobody is paying for such effort. Regards, Miguel >Please keep also in account that chess engine analysis is more deep and accurate >at standard time. > >w.b.r. >Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.