Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:35:09 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 17:28:38, John Merlino wrote:
>On March 28, 2002 at 15:55:15, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>
>>[d] rn1qkbnr/pbpp2pp/1p2p3/5P2/2PP4/3B4/PP3PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 0 4
>>
>>The GM annotator to a game says that White wins as follows if Black plays
>>5...Bxg2, but Fritz does not agree:
>>
>>"5...Bxg2 6.Qh5+ g6 7.fxg6 Bg7 8.gxh7+ Kf8 9.Bg5!! Nf6 10.Qh4 Bxh1 11.Ne2
>>planning Nf4, and even a rook down, White's attack is too strong."
>>
>>Fritz thinks Black is better here, with 11...Na6 or 11...Kf7 being best.
>>
>>Is 5...Bxg2 really bad? If so, is this line the refutation? If so, how does
>>White continue?
>
>Chessmaster also does not agree. Here's the analysis after 11.Ne2 (the PV says
>the move number is 10 because your FEN string and your analysis above does not
>agree on the move number):
>
>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>0:00 1/3 -2.17 1624 10...Bf3 11.Nd2 Bxe2 12.Kxe2
>0:00 1/3 -2.37 2072 10...d6 11.Nd2 Bb7 12.O-O-O
>0:00 1/3 -2.40 2669 10...c5 11.Nd2 d5 12.O-O-O dxc4
> 13.Nxc4
>0:00 1/3 -2.46 4500 10...Bb7 11.Nbc3 d5 12.cxd5 exd5
>0:00 1/3 -2.53 5337 10...d5 11.Nf4 Kf7 12.Qh5+ Ke7
>0:00 1/4 -1.94 6477 10...d5 11.Nf4 Kf7 12.Qh5+ Ke7
> 13.Ng6+ Kd7 14.Bxf6 Qxf6 15.Nxh8
> Bxh8
>0:00 1/4 -2.31 6804 10...Bf3 11.Nd2 Bxe2 12.Bxe2 Nc6
>0:00 1/4 -2.48 8028 10...c5 11.dxc5 bxc5 12.Nd2 d6
> 13.O-O-O
>0:00 2/5 -2.16 19755 10...c5 11.Nf4 Kf7 12.Nh5 Rf8 13.Nxg7
> Kxg7 14.dxc5 bxc5
>0:00 2/5 -2.31 21989 10...Bf3 11.Nd2 Bxe2 12.Bxe2 Nc6
>0:00 2/5 -2.41 27402 10...Nc6 11.Nd2 Nb4 12.Bg6 d6
>0:00 2/6 -2.53 36335 10...Nc6 11.Nd2 Nb4 12.Bg6 d6 13.Qh3
>0:02 3/7 -2.24 129583 10...Nc6 11.Nd2 Kf7 12.O-O-O Nb4
> 13.Bb1 Bb7 14.Re1
>0:08 3/8 -2.29 404071 10...Nc6 11.Nd2 Kf7 12.Nf4 Ne7
> 13.O-O-O Bb7 14.Nh5
>0:26 4/9 -1.76 1462170 10...Nc6 11.Nf4 Nb4 12.Bg6 Ke7
> 13.Nd2 Bb7 14.Nh5 Qf8 15.Nxg7 Qxg7
>2:28 4/10 -1.40 8515263 10...Nc6 11.Ng3 d5 12.Nxh1 dxc4
> 13.Be4 Nxd4 14.Bxa8 Qxa8 15.Qxd4
> Qxh1+ 16.Ke2 Nd5
>
>Here's what CM says in the initial position (take the pawn!):
>
>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>0:00 1/3 -2.07 1825 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bb4+
> 7.Nd2 Bxd2+ 8.Bxd2 Bxh1 9.gxh7+ Kf8
>0:00 1/4 0.80 5920 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Nf6 7.g7+
> Nxh5 8.gxh8=Q Bxh1 9.Qxh7
>0:00 1/4 0.72 9353 4...Bb4+ 5.Kf1 Nf6 6.a3 Bd6 7.Nc3
>0:00 2/5 0.56 29194 4...Bb4+ 5.Kf1 exf5 6.a3 Bd6 7.Bxf5
> Nf6
>0:01 2/6 0.71 75311 4...Bb4+ 5.Kf1 exf5 6.a3 Bd6 7.Bxf5
> Ne7 8.Bg5
>0:01 2/6 0.31 96325 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.gxh7+
> Kf8 8.Bg5 Ne7 9.Bxe7+ Qxe7
>0:04 3/7 0.08 247439 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.Bg5
> Qc8 8.gxh7+ Kf8 9.Qg4 Bxh1 10.Qf4+
> Nf6 11.Bxf6
>0:09 3/8 0.08 626673 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.Bg5
> Qc8 8.gxh7+ Kf8 9.Qg4 Bxh1 10.Qf4+
> Nf6 11.Bxf6
>0:29 4/9 -0.65 2072614 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.gxh7+
> Kf8 8.hxg8=Q+ Kxg8 9.Qg6 Bxh1 10.Nd2
> Nc6 11.Ngf3 Qf8
>1:51 4/10 -0.72 7999422 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.gxh7+
> Kf8 8.Qg6 Bxh1 9.hxg8=Q+ Rxg8 10.Nc3
> Bxd4 11.Bh6+ Bg7 12.O-O-O
>6:38 5/11 -0.67 31336451 4...Bxg2 5.Qh5+ g6 6.fxg6 Bg7 7.gxh7+
> Kf8 8.hxg8=Q+ Kxg8 9.Qg4 Bxh1 10.Bg5
> Qe8 11.Nc3 Qh5 12.Qg3 Qxh2
>
>jm
Hi John,
I saw another post earlier where you had the CM using tablebase.
Will this be a standard feature of CM9000?. What other chnages/features will be
new?. Is this CM9000 being tested against other programs or simply users?.
Thanks.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.