Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 17:10:38 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 05:41:49, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 28, 2002 at 01:41:45, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On March 27, 2002 at 15:55:09, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On March 27, 2002 at 12:11:25, Roy Eassa wrote: >>> >>>>On March 27, 2002 at 12:06:25, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 26, 2002 at 17:33:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On March 26, 2002 at 17:21:42, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>GM Gulko is known not to loose too many games with white, he can keep up a >>>>>>>rating of over 2700 even against Kasparov he has a winning record, but with the >>>>>>>black pieces his record is below 2525. >>>>>> >>>>>>I wish they would run the contest again. I would like to see how much he has >>>>>>learned from the first pass. >>>>>He has learned nothing ;GMs play lousy chess compared to machines. >>>> >>>> >>>>Maybe, but a grandmaster in his mid 50s managed to score 37.5% against top PC >>>>programs in relatively fast games (winning against the "super" Shredder in the >>>>process). I'd say mankind is still in the game! >>> >>>Quite Right! >>> >>>I'm afraid I may have not been so informative and kind in my response. >>>It's annoying to read nonsense from trolls. Instead I may have replied, >>>"You're a weak player who never learns, and is so blinded by purile emotion, >>>that you can't assimilate the actual data that is sitting right before you, >>>obvious to any reasonable person." >>>"I just see sour grapes if your model the "Chess Universe" crumbles before you, >>>only to find you're at it's lowest end of it's spectrum; not able to accept this >>>you go and stomp in your corner, making alot of noise, nothing more!" >>> >>>I'm glad you repiled and not me Roy!;~) >>>Terry >>> >>>P.S. Excellent analysis of Rxg7+!!, I didn't go through every line so >>>meticulously! Very Good! >>> >>>Just deep enough to see White was mating, but I was tired!;) >>Actually your the one who is trolling.I have never seen the games you claimed to >>have won from Rebel > >First this has nothing to do with this thread, so you're trolling right now! >Second, if I showed games I'd won against Fritz or Rebel or what have you, you >could say I cheated by taking back moves, so why post them? > >You just come out and attack my credibility, now if that isn't "Fishing" I don't >know what is? > >Here's where you put your both feet in your mouth;"He has learned nothing ;GMs >play lousy chess compared to machines." > >So I'm in pretty good company when you discredit GM Gulko and GM's in general >and then discredit my personal wins against machines! > >If you can't behave, the door is open, you may leave anytime. No I wont say you cheated.But those games striclty exist in your mind.or else you would have posted them by now.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.