Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 19:38:20 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 20:08:05, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On March 28, 2002 at 15:55:15, Roy Eassa wrote: > >> >>[d] rn1qkbnr/pbpp2pp/1p2p3/5P2/2PP4/3B4/PP3PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 0 4 >> >>The GM annotator to a game says that White wins as follows if Black plays >>5...Bxg2, but Fritz does not agree: >> >>"5...Bxg2 6.Qh5+ g6 7.fxg6 Bg7 8.gxh7+ Kf8 9.Bg5!! Nf6 10.Qh4 Bxh1 11.Ne2 >>planning Nf4, and even a rook down, White's attack is too strong." >> >>Fritz thinks Black is better here, with 11...Na6 or 11...Kf7 being best. >> >>Is 5...Bxg2 really bad? If so, is this line the refutation? If so, how does >>White continue? >Another Comedy showing that GMs suck at chess. The line is good enough to draw, show me a win with Black! Patzer! <GRIN>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.