Author: K. Burcham
Date: 09:10:52 03/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2002 at 11:29:42, Harald Faber wrote: >On March 29, 2002 at 10:46:37, K. Burcham wrote: > >>THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-03-27 85022 games played by 237 computers >>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>> 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2748 38 -35 395 68% 2616 >>> 2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2714 34 -33 460 63% 2619 >>> 4 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2708 37 -36 381 61% 2626 >>> 5 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2706 37 -36 379 61% 2626 >>> 6 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 34 -33 436 58% 2630 >>> 7 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2680 36 -35 407 63% 2587 >> >> >> >> >>Kurt Utzinger tournament >>1: Junior 7 7.5 / 12 XXX 0=. 1== 11. 1=0 1=. >> 2: Fritz 7006 7.0 / 12 1=. XXX 01. ==0 1=. 110 >> 3: Hiarcs 7.32 7.0 / 12 0== 10. XXX =1. ==. 1=1 >> 4: Shredder 6.02 6.0 / 12 00. ==1 =0. XXX =11 ==. >> 5: TheKing 3.12 X 4.5 / 12 0=1 0=. ==. =00 XXX ==. >> 6: Chess Tiger 14.0 4.0 / 12 0=. 001 0=0 ==. ==. XXX >> >> >>kburcham > >So what is your conclusion then? :-) I have already posted my conclusion several weeks ago. In my post I gave my opinion on this tournament compared to Sarahs, Jonas, and SSDF. I do not like such a big difference in results posted here. it makes this forum not respected by other chess players. it would seem that the SSDF with so many games played would have meaning. I could put together a tournament post against any program here. like I said before, everyone here is going to believe what they want. the utzinger results make a joke out of SSDF results. kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.