Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: So which conclusion do you have?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 14:14:21 03/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 29, 2002 at 12:10:52, K. Burcham wrote:

>On March 29, 2002 at 11:29:42, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On March 29, 2002 at 10:46:37, K. Burcham wrote:
>>
>>>THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-03-27   85022 games played by  237 computers
>>>>                                           Rating   +     -  Games   Won  Oppo
>>>>                                           ------  ---   --- -----   ---  ----
>>>>   1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz         2748   38   -35   395   68%  2616
>>>>   2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200   2714   34   -33   460   63%  2619
>>>>   4 Gambit Tiger 2.0  256MB Athlon 1200     2708   37   -36   381   61%  2626
>>>>   5 Shredder 6.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz     2706   37   -36   379   61%  2626
>>>>   6 Junior 7.0  256MB  Athlon 1200 MHz      2684   34   -33   436   58%  2630
>>>>   7 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2680   36   -35   407   63%  2587
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Kurt Utzinger tournament
>>>1: Junior 7           7.5 / 12   XXX 0=. 1== 11. 1=0 1=.
>>> 2: Fritz 7006         7.0 / 12   1=. XXX 01. ==0 1=. 110
>>> 3: Hiarcs 7.32        7.0 / 12   0== 10. XXX =1. ==. 1=1
>>> 4: Shredder 6.02      6.0 / 12   00. ==1 =0. XXX =11 ==.
>>> 5: TheKing 3.12 X     4.5 / 12   0=1 0=. ==. =00 XXX ==.
>>> 6: Chess Tiger 14.0   4.0 / 12   0=. 001 0=0 ==. ==. XXX
>>>
>>>
>>>kburcham
>>
>>So what is your conclusion then? :-)
>
>I have already posted my conclusion several weeks ago.
>In my post I gave my opinion on this tournament compared to Sarahs, Jonas, and
>SSDF. I do not like such a big difference in results posted here. it makes this
>forum not respected by other chess players.
>it would seem that the SSDF with so many games played would have meaning.
>I could put together a tournament post against any program here.
>like I said before, everyone here is going to believe what they want.
>the utzinger results make a joke out of SSDF results.
>kburcham

Sorry, but the only joke here is your conclusion.
You compare apples with oranges.
Take a look at the tournament-/match-conditions. They are different so that
comparing does not make any sense at all. Do you compare Indycar racing with
Formula 1? No? So why do you here?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.