Author: K. Burcham
Date: 14:37:49 03/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2002 at 17:14:21, Harald Faber wrote: >On March 29, 2002 at 12:10:52, K. Burcham wrote: > >>On March 29, 2002 at 11:29:42, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On March 29, 2002 at 10:46:37, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>>THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-03-27 85022 games played by 237 computers >>>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>>> 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2748 38 -35 395 68% 2616 >>>>> 2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2714 34 -33 460 63% 2619 >>>>> 4 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2708 37 -36 381 61% 2626 >>>>> 5 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2706 37 -36 379 61% 2626 >>>>> 6 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 34 -33 436 58% 2630 >>>>> 7 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2680 36 -35 407 63% 2587 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Kurt Utzinger tournament >>>>1: Junior 7 7.5 / 12 XXX 0=. 1== 11. 1=0 1=. >>>> 2: Fritz 7006 7.0 / 12 1=. XXX 01. ==0 1=. 110 >>>> 3: Hiarcs 7.32 7.0 / 12 0== 10. XXX =1. ==. 1=1 >>>> 4: Shredder 6.02 6.0 / 12 00. ==1 =0. XXX =11 ==. >>>> 5: TheKing 3.12 X 4.5 / 12 0=1 0=. ==. =00 XXX ==. >>>> 6: Chess Tiger 14.0 4.0 / 12 0=. 001 0=0 ==. ==. XXX >>>> >>>> >>>>kburcham >>> >>>So what is your conclusion then? :-) >> >>I have already posted my conclusion several weeks ago. >>In my post I gave my opinion on this tournament compared to Sarahs, Jonas, and >>SSDF. I do not like such a big difference in results posted here. it makes this >>forum not respected by other chess players. >>it would seem that the SSDF with so many games played would have meaning. >>I could put together a tournament post against any program here. >>like I said before, everyone here is going to believe what they want. >>the utzinger results make a joke out of SSDF results. >>kburcham > >Sorry, but the only joke here is your conclusion. >You compare apples with oranges. >Take a look at the tournament-/match-conditions. They are different so that >comparing does not make any sense at all. Do you compare Indycar racing with >Formula 1? No? So why do you here? because some here buy programs and form opinions on tournament results. some here are not aware that these are the nunn test positions. some here will only read the results. some will think the program played a normal chess game. this tournament is like the test positions we run here. or it is like a test suite. we could just start a tournament with all programs starting with move 25 in Deep Blue vs Kasparov game 2. what can we conclude from this data? what will we do with the info that program A starting from this position is stroger than program B? kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.