Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:04:27 03/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2002 at 07:47:41, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On March 29, 2002 at 07:42:37, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>It's also dedicated to those who still believe that there is no performance >>increase/decrease when playing on different time controls. (Hi Christophe!) > >Hmm, that would be me too :) > >>4) You are invited to shoot the above into pieces. > >My main argument against it would be that the SSDF ratings have >(approx) 30 elo error margins to either side. If you compare the >ratings of two engines, you have to cope with this twice. The >speedup ELO numbers are on the order of 50-130 ELO. > >Basically, I think this means that using those numbers to predict >future performance will have an error margin so big, that the list >is meaningless. In 2004 I have a 6000Mhz computer zo I'll never know hehe But it is treu that there is more gain in ply bij diferent programs Like I mentioned before When there was a mesage about the Fritz benchmark at diferent speeds Where I said that junior gains more then Fritz by more speed.This was checked and I was corect. And Fritz with more Ram It also is not likely I will switsch to Intel again. I have seen some procesecors they have baked for a much more expensive price. And I must say i went sick from it. it was ss slow as a turtle. Compared to my AMD Thunderbird Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.