Author: K. Burcham
Date: 05:58:03 03/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 2002 at 02:13:08, Chessfun wrote: >On March 30, 2002 at 00:45:15, K. Burcham wrote: > >>In this position Gambit Tiger 2.0 played 10.Nfg5 >>after this move, eval began to fall. >>eval stayed at -1.00 to -2.00 most of game for white. >> [D] r1q1kb1r/p2n1ppp/bpn1p3/2ppP3/3P4/2P2N1N/PP3PPP/RBBQK2R w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>if anyone is aggravated about 7.Ndf3 sorry, the move the GM said I should >>have played was the only move in Gambit Tiger book (7.Ne2). my mistake. >>i consider these books to be a piece of art, so if someone had done this to my >>book, i would have been mad. sorry. > >Correct 7. Ne2 is the only move in the gambit book. >How was you connected to ICC that this move wasn't played? was you using Blitzin >and if using Gambit 2.0 was this the CB version?. Reason I ask that specifically >is it's tough using that version to select normal, agressive and suicidal >without manually modifying the ct.ini. > >If using the Chess Partner version was wasn't you directly connected to ICC so >that Gambit made it's own moves?. > >Sarah. i was not using the Chessbase version. i had two pcs. one gamer, one online. not directly connected, manual moves. kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.