Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:38:26 03/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 2002 at 16:39:04, ERIQ wrote: >Inclusion of about five GM's over 2600 fide if they played maybe 50 games each I >think we would have a great list to refer to. Just a thought. > > Sign, > Eriq SSDF deals strictly with comp. vs comp. ratings, and in no way reflects human vs comp. ratings. You need a different list! Human vs Computers, at SSDF if indeed something could be arranged by the SSDF to give incentive for human grandmasters to participate. So I think the SSDF is very reliable, as long as you keep in mind these are computer ratings and not human ratings. Although, it would be great to have a second list that is only human vs computers. It would then reflect, if enough games could be played, an accurate rating list for computers vs humans. But you can't put it in one list. That would be mixing apples with oranges. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.