Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CT 14.9 for Palm Failed to beat Faile 1.4 Using Arena Beta 4

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 22:29:16 03/30/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 30, 2002 at 21:58:37, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>This was a great ending in which the bishop once more prove to be stronger
>than the knight.

If you are interested to test it against my program(movei) I can send you it.

It has no opening book or hash tables and it does not ponder but it did not
prevent it to win a tournament

see http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/24144.htm

Bewolf was one of the weakest programs in the tournament because it likes to
resign in winning positions(without this mistake it could probably win the
tournament with 8.5/10 and my program could probably also get 8.5/10 but
unfortunately it played too well in one of the games against Bewolf and got a
draw).

Monarch lost 2 games on time but at least my program had a clear advantage when
it happened.



I did not look at the game that you posted when I write this post but the fact
that faile played well in the endgame is a surprise because I know that faile is
weak in the endgame because it often fails to do the king active.

I believe that my program is not weaker than faile so if you are interested I
may send you my program to test it against palm tiger(I consider palm tiger as
favourite after it surprised us by beating gaviota and averno that are stronger
than my program but my program has chances).

Note that I did not test my program against faile with opening book but only
against faile without opening book at different time controls but from
experience I do not think that opening book is very important when you do not
play a match of more than one game

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.