Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 07:01:40 03/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 31, 2002 at 08:26:41, Sune Fischer wrote: >I don't get it, what has that got to do with a side-to-move bonus? >I think the idea of such a bonus would be if one could choose between two >different pv's leading to the same position, only with side-to-move reversed. >I think this can happen in some cases, although I can't think of one right now >:) 1.e3 e5 2.e4 and 1.e4 e5 both lead to the same position with a different side to move The issue is that this bonus is wrong more often than just in zugzwang positions. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.