Author: Art Basham
Date: 09:46:07 03/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks Andrew for that correction..! Yes, I see now... Ne2 is the best move here....and it takes about 12 ply to find... I worked on this diag. several years ago when we did not have the faster machines and excellent programs we have now...:-) best regards, ab ============== On March 31, 2002 at 12:32:35, Andrew Williams wrote: >On March 31, 2002 at 12:05:27, Art Basham wrote: > >>White wins... 1. Bd6, not BxR...!! >> >>[D]r4rk1/5p2/p1b1pQpq/8/1B2P3/2NR4/PPP3PP/1K6 w - - >> >>Gambit Tiger 2.0 takes 9 ply to find it...etc. >> >>The move actually played here by the human GM was Nd5..??? >>but i like the computor's move better...Bd6..!! > >PM takes 6 seconds to see this on my Athlon 1200, but on reflection it >prefers Ne2: > >Allocating Hash Tables: >TTSIZE=1048576 ASTTSIZE=2097152 PAWNTTSIZE=524288 > >Found 5-men endgame table bases. > >COMPLETELY CLEARING HASH TABLES > >8 r . . . . r k . >7 . . . . . o . . >6 o . b . o Q o q >5 . . . . . . . . >4 . B . . P . . . >3 . . N R . . . . >2 P P P . . . P P >1 . K . . . . . . > > a b c d e f g h > > > 1> 208 0 5 1.Bxf8 > 1= 295 0 66 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 > 2> 295 0 71 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 > 2= 295 0 127 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 > 3> 295 0 134 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 > 3b 296 0 366 1.Rh3 > 3= 296 0 606 1.Rh3 > 4> 296 0 1149 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 2.h3 > 4= 304 0 2068 1.Bxf8 Kxf8 2.Rf3 > 5> 284 0 5927 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Rh3 Qd2 > 5= 291 0 7738 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Rh3 Qd2 > 6> 291 0 9572 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Rh3 Qd2 3.g4 > 6= 301 0 19926 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.h4 Qg7 3.Qe7 > 7> 281 0 63669 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.h4 Qg7 3.Qxg7 Kxg7 4.Rd6 Rc8 > 5.b4 > 7= 290 0 83635 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.h4 Qg7 3.Qxg7 Kxg7 4.b4 f5 > 5.exf5 Rxf5 > 8> 290 0 101148 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Qe5 Qg7 3.Qd6 Rc8 4.b4 > 8= 295 1 237443 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Qe5 Qg7 3.Qc7 Bb5 4.Rf3 > 9> 288 3 556950 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Qe5 Rc8 3.b4 Qg7 4.Qxg7 Kxg7 > 5.Kb2 f5 6.exf5 exf5 > 9= 288 3 664754 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Qe5 Rc8 3.b4 Qg7 4.Qxg7 Kxg7 > 5.Kb2 f5 6.exf5 exf5 >10> 288 3 754773 1.Bxf8 Rxf8 2.Qe5 Rc8 3.g4 Qg7 4.Qa5 Ra8 5.b4 >10b 293 6 1201211 1.Bd6 Qg7 2.Be5 Qxf6 3.Bxf6 >10= 364 10 1910004 1.Bd6 Rad8 2.Rh3 Qxh3 3.Bxf8 Qxc3 4.bxc3 Rxf8 > 5.Qd4 Rb8 6.Kc1 >11> 357 20 3799925 1.Bd6 Rad8 2.Rh3 Qxh3 3.Bxf8 Qxc3 4.bxc3 Rd1 > 5.Kb2 Kxf8 6.Qf3 Rd2 >11= 362 20 3941645 1.Bd6 Rad8 2.Rh3 Qxh3 3.Bxf8 Qxc3 4.bxc3 Rd1 > 5.Kb2 Kxf8 6.Qf3 Rd2 >12> 362 56 9989523 1.Ne2 >12= 410 71 12758595 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Qg7 4.Qxg7 Kxg7 > 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Rc3 Kf6 7.a4 Rd8 8.Rf3 >13> 410 81 14501850 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Qg7 4.Qxg7 Kxg7 > 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Rc3 Rh8 7.h3 Rd8 8.Rd3 Rd5 9.Rxd5 >13= 421 183 31534964 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Qg7 4.Qxg7 Kxg7 > 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Nc3 Rc8 7.b4 Rc4 8.Kb3 Rg4 9.g3 >14> 421 218 37239003 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Qg7 4.Bc3 e5 > 5.Bxe5 >14= 443 578 94162255 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Rfc8 4.Bc3 Rxc3 > 5.Nxc3 Qg7 6.Qe7 Qf8 7.Qxf8 >15> 443 655 106285659 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Rfc8 4.Bc3 Rxc3 > 5.Nxc3 Qg7 6.Qe7 Qf8 7.Qxf8 > >NODES per second 159300 > >NODES: ab: 71973277 q: 71399267 tot: 143372544 >TT PERFORMANCE >probes: 193677975 hits: 25371357 cutoffs: 18512492 >secondary: 1379507 entries: 60526567 replacements: 2459565 >too far: 24289 (0%) >probes: 15% hits: 13% cutoffs: 72% secondary: 5% >NULL MOVE: attempts: 34617236 cutoffs: 29511978 (85%) >CUTOFFS: first move: 21966842 later: 2014969 (91%) >PAWN TT: probes: 175772843 hits: 167497312 (21%) >EXTENSIONS: checks: 8153831 srtc: 1851424 recaptures: 432221 pushes: >353739 promotes: 0 mate: 363870 null: 0 >DEPTHS: main: 54 qsearch: 54 >QPRUNING: would have pruned: 0 pruned move best: 0 0.00 % >EGTB: probes: 0 hits: 0 (hit-rate: 0%) > >r4rk1/5p2/p1b1pQpq/8/1B2P3/2NR4/PPP3PP/1K6 w - - acd 14; acn 143372544; acs >900; ce 448; fmvn 1; hmvc 0; id "Bd6.epd.0001"; pm Ne2 ; pv 1.Ne2 Bxe4 2.Rh3 >Bxc2 3.Kxc2 Rfc8 4.Bc3 Rxc3 5.Nxc3 Qg7 6.Qe7 Qf8 7.Qb7 ; > > > >Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.