Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:05:51 03/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 31, 2002 at 17:00:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 31, 2002 at 16:28:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Uri sent me his program movei00_6 and I started a match of possible 10 games at >>45 Minutes per sides. Since movei00_6 doesn't have a Book Opening, I decided to >>make the match even and play Chess Tiger 14.9 beta2 without its Book, but I also >>forced the first move for CT 14.9 1.h3.... You will observed one of the best >>game ever at this Low level probably both programs are rated closed to 2125. I >>love these two moves from CT 14.9 70.Rxe6 and 76. Nxb5! > >Thanks for the game > >2 notes: > >1)movei has no learning function so you need to give tiger a different opening >move in the rest of the games in order not to see the same game twice(for >example 1.a3) > >2)I tested movei mainly in x minutes/y moves so it's time management is not >optimal for x minutes/game(it is possible to improve it's time management in all >time controls but it is possible to improve it more in x minutes/game). > >When the time control is x minutes/game movei simply asssumes every move that >the time control is x minutes for the next 30 moves and I know that it is a >mistake but the previous tournaments that it played were x minutes/y moves and >not x minutes/game. > > >I do not think that it could help movei in this game because it seems that it >had a losing position after 22 moves. > >The black move at e4 is weak and movei does not understand it and is not going >to understand it in the near future. > >[D]r3k3/ppp2p1p/5n2/5N2/4p1P1/P1P4P/1PP5/2K4R b q - > >Uri I forgot one thing: This game is not exactly x minutes/game but fisher time control. movei is using this information for it's decision about time management but when the time that is added is 1 second it has almost no influence. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.