Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 23:39:34 03/31/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote:

>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote:
>>
>>>thanks in advance!
>>
>>I did not have time enough to test it very much
>
>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0
>
>
>April fool ?.
>
>Sarah.

I know that the date is 1.4 but I see no reason to suspect this post.

I can suspect if I read that the new version is 100 elo better but
a claim about 15-20 elo improvement that is only an impression is
not something that seems to be related with 1.4.

Uri

• Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 05:52:31 04/01/02
  • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 06:04:59 04/01/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 12:08:32 04/03/02
      • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 12:55:39 04/03/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 06:09:55 04/01/02
      • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 12:10:34 04/03/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.