Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 06:10:41 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 00:52:31, Uri Blass wrote:
>On March 31, 2002 at 20:54:49, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:20:07, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:00:08, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:28:04, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Uri sent me his program movei00_6 and I started a match of possible 10 games at
>>>>>45 Minutes per sides. Since movei00_6 doesn't have a Book Opening, I decided to
>>>>>make the match even and play Chess Tiger 14.9 beta2 without its Book, but I also
>>>>>forced the first move for CT 14.9 1.h3.... You will observed one of the best
>>>>>game ever at this Low level probably both programs are rated closed to 2125. I
>>>>>love these two moves from CT 14.9 70.Rxe6 and 76. Nxb5!
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the game
>>>>
>>>>2 notes:
>>>>
>>>>1)movei has no learning function so you need to give tiger a different opening
>>>>move in the rest of the games in order not to see the same game twice(for
>>>>example 1.a3)
>>>>
>>>>2)I tested movei mainly in x minutes/y moves so it's time management is not
>>>>optimal for x minutes/game(it is possible to improve it's time management in all
>>>>time controls but it is possible to improve it more in x minutes/game).
>>>>
>>>>When the time control is x minutes/game movei simply asssumes every move that
>>>>the time control is x minutes for the next 30 moves
>>>
>>>last addition:
>>>
>>>I think that I did not explain it clearly
>>>
>>>In this case I mean that x is not a constant and x means the time per game that
>>>my program gets as an input from winboard every move.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't worry it is not that bad. I know some programs are still using this system
>>(taking the time left to play the game and dividing it by 30 to get the "target
>>time" for the next move).
>
>I know that is not so bad relative to other programs but my comparison is not
>with other programs.
>
>I believe that one of my advantage in x minutes/y moves relative to part of the
>other programs is better time management inspite of the fact that the time
>management can be improved at all time controls(for example if my program has x
>minutes per game or x minutes for the next y moves it is going to never use more
>than y/2 minutes and it may be a mistake if y is small).
>
>Uri
You mean x/2 or do I miss the point?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.