Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:25:23 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 09:10:41, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 00:52:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 31, 2002 at 20:54:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:20:07, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:00:08, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:28:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Uri sent me his program movei00_6 and I started a match of possible 10 games at >>>>>>45 Minutes per sides. Since movei00_6 doesn't have a Book Opening, I decided to >>>>>>make the match even and play Chess Tiger 14.9 beta2 without its Book, but I also >>>>>>forced the first move for CT 14.9 1.h3.... You will observed one of the best >>>>>>game ever at this Low level probably both programs are rated closed to 2125. I >>>>>>love these two moves from CT 14.9 70.Rxe6 and 76. Nxb5! >>>>> >>>>>Thanks for the game >>>>> >>>>>2 notes: >>>>> >>>>>1)movei has no learning function so you need to give tiger a different opening >>>>>move in the rest of the games in order not to see the same game twice(for >>>>>example 1.a3) >>>>> >>>>>2)I tested movei mainly in x minutes/y moves so it's time management is not >>>>>optimal for x minutes/game(it is possible to improve it's time management in all >>>>>time controls but it is possible to improve it more in x minutes/game). >>>>> >>>>>When the time control is x minutes/game movei simply asssumes every move that >>>>>the time control is x minutes for the next 30 moves >>>> >>>>last addition: >>>> >>>>I think that I did not explain it clearly >>>> >>>>In this case I mean that x is not a constant and x means the time per game that >>>>my program gets as an input from winboard every move. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>> >>>Don't worry it is not that bad. I know some programs are still using this system >>>(taking the time left to play the game and dividing it by 30 to get the "target >>>time" for the next move). >> >>I know that is not so bad relative to other programs but my comparison is not >>with other programs. >> >>I believe that one of my advantage in x minutes/y moves relative to part of the >>other programs is better time management inspite of the fact that the time >>management can be improved at all time controls(for example if my program has x >>minutes per game or x minutes for the next y moves it is going to never use more >>than y/2 minutes and it may be a mistake if y is small). >> >>Uri > > > >You mean x/2 or do I miss the point? > > > > Christophe You are right I meant x/2 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.