Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 07:53:02 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 09:25:23, Uri Blass wrote:
>On April 01, 2002 at 09:10:41, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 01, 2002 at 00:52:31, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On March 31, 2002 at 20:54:49, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:20:07, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 17:00:08, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:28:04, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Uri sent me his program movei00_6 and I started a match of possible 10 games at
>>>>>>>45 Minutes per sides. Since movei00_6 doesn't have a Book Opening, I decided to
>>>>>>>make the match even and play Chess Tiger 14.9 beta2 without its Book, but I also
>>>>>>>forced the first move for CT 14.9 1.h3.... You will observed one of the best
>>>>>>>game ever at this Low level probably both programs are rated closed to 2125. I
>>>>>>>love these two moves from CT 14.9 70.Rxe6 and 76. Nxb5!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks for the game
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2 notes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1)movei has no learning function so you need to give tiger a different opening
>>>>>>move in the rest of the games in order not to see the same game twice(for
>>>>>>example 1.a3)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2)I tested movei mainly in x minutes/y moves so it's time management is not
>>>>>>optimal for x minutes/game(it is possible to improve it's time management in all
>>>>>>time controls but it is possible to improve it more in x minutes/game).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>When the time control is x minutes/game movei simply asssumes every move that
>>>>>>the time control is x minutes for the next 30 moves
>>>>>
>>>>>last addition:
>>>>>
>>>>>I think that I did not explain it clearly
>>>>>
>>>>>In this case I mean that x is not a constant and x means the time per game that
>>>>>my program gets as an input from winboard every move.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't worry it is not that bad. I know some programs are still using this system
>>>>(taking the time left to play the game and dividing it by 30 to get the "target
>>>>time" for the next move).
>>>
>>>I know that is not so bad relative to other programs but my comparison is not
>>>with other programs.
>>>
>>>I believe that one of my advantage in x minutes/y moves relative to part of the
>>>other programs is better time management inspite of the fact that the time
>>>management can be improved at all time controls(for example if my program has x
>>>minutes per game or x minutes for the next y moves it is going to never use more
>>>than y/2 minutes and it may be a mistake if y is small).
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>
>>You mean x/2 or do I miss the point?
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>You are right
>I meant x/2
>
>Uri
OK I see.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.