Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:39:34 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 17:31:53, eric guttenberg wrote: >I believe that Chess Tiger 14 is one of the strongest programs available. >The SSDF results certainly suggest that. Yet I watch this tournament and >see CT14 do so poorly round after round. Not much better in Kurt's previous >tournament. I see where people keep saying the results will be better after >enough games are played but there have been quite a few games already (124). > >Isn't it possible that Chess Tiger just does not perform as well in the >single computer environment as some others do? Am I the only one who >is wondering about that? > >eric I did not see special problems in the previous tournament and there was no significant difference between tiger and Junior or Shredder. The king was not tested by the ssdf when it is known that Fritz7 that came in second place has better rating than tiger also based on the ssdf results. The last tournament is done in the nunn positions so it is not related to the ssdf results. The number of games is not enough to come to conclusions and tiger may get better result if you wait for more games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.