Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:31:16 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 17:39:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>On April 01, 2002 at 17:31:53, eric guttenberg wrote:
>
>>I believe that Chess Tiger 14 is one of the strongest programs available.
>>The SSDF results certainly suggest that. Yet I watch this tournament and
>>see CT14 do so poorly round after round. Not much better in Kurt's previous
>>tournament. I see where people keep saying the results will be better after
>>enough games are played but there have been quite a few games already (124).
>>
>>Isn't it possible that Chess Tiger just does not perform as well in the
>>single computer environment as some others do? Am I the only one who
>>is wondering about that?
>>
>>eric
>
>I did not see special problems in the previous tournament and there was no
>significant difference between tiger and Junior or Shredder.
>
>The king was not tested by the ssdf when it is known that Fritz7 that came in
>second place has better rating than tiger also based on the ssdf results.
>
>The last tournament is done in the nunn positions so it is not related to the
>ssdf results.
>
>The number of games is not enough to come to conclusions and tiger may get
>better result if you wait for more games.
>
>Uri
Frankly I'm a little bit tired of waiting.
This Tiger does not impress me at all. ;-)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.