Author: pavel
Date: 20:19:35 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 22:31:16, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 17:39:34, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 17:31:53, eric guttenberg wrote: >> >>>I believe that Chess Tiger 14 is one of the strongest programs available. >>>The SSDF results certainly suggest that. Yet I watch this tournament and >>>see CT14 do so poorly round after round. Not much better in Kurt's previous >>>tournament. I see where people keep saying the results will be better after >>>enough games are played but there have been quite a few games already (124). >>> >>>Isn't it possible that Chess Tiger just does not perform as well in the >>>single computer environment as some others do? Am I the only one who >>>is wondering about that? >>> >>>eric >> >>I did not see special problems in the previous tournament and there was no >>significant difference between tiger and Junior or Shredder. >> >>The king was not tested by the ssdf when it is known that Fritz7 that came in >>second place has better rating than tiger also based on the ssdf results. >> >>The last tournament is done in the nunn positions so it is not related to the >>ssdf results. >> >>The number of games is not enough to come to conclusions and tiger may get >>better result if you wait for more games. >> >>Uri > > > > >Frankly I'm a little bit tired of waiting. So am I (hint, hint). ;) pavs > >This Tiger does not impress me at all. ;-) > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.