Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 21:07:15 04/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 23:19:35, pavel wrote:
>On April 01, 2002 at 22:31:16, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 01, 2002 at 17:39:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On April 01, 2002 at 17:31:53, eric guttenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>>I believe that Chess Tiger 14 is one of the strongest programs available.
>>>>The SSDF results certainly suggest that. Yet I watch this tournament and
>>>>see CT14 do so poorly round after round. Not much better in Kurt's previous
>>>>tournament. I see where people keep saying the results will be better after
>>>>enough games are played but there have been quite a few games already (124).
>>>>
>>>>Isn't it possible that Chess Tiger just does not perform as well in the
>>>>single computer environment as some others do? Am I the only one who
>>>>is wondering about that?
>>>>
>>>>eric
>>>
>>>I did not see special problems in the previous tournament and there was no
>>>significant difference between tiger and Junior or Shredder.
>>>
>>>The king was not tested by the ssdf when it is known that Fritz7 that came in
>>>second place has better rating than tiger also based on the ssdf results.
>>>
>>>The last tournament is done in the nunn positions so it is not related to the
>>>ssdf results.
>>>
>>>The number of games is not enough to come to conclusions and tiger may get
>>>better result if you wait for more games.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Frankly I'm a little bit tired of waiting.
>
>So am I (hint, hint).
>
>;)
>pavs
:) :)
If you can't wait for the latest Tiger, buy yourself a Palm! My latest creation
is going to be released today in the form of Chess Tiger 14.9 for Palm.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.