Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 00:16:05 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 19:31:26, Terry McCracken wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 18:42:20, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 17:56:12, Art Basham wrote: >> >>>Here white plays Bxg6..!! >>>(taken from the Yazgac test suite...) >>> >>>[D]r1b5/p2k1r1p/3P2pP/1ppR4/2P2p2/2P5/P1B4P/4R1K1 w - - >>> >>>I do not know if a computor program can find this one or not..:-) >> >>Many can, but the problem is that it is not the only solution. >>IIRC crafty chooses the prosaic cxb5 that also wins (with the idea of Ba4 and >>b6+). The pressure is too much for black to take. >> >>Regards, >>Miguel > >True but it's about finding the "Best Move" and _all_ programmes look at cxb5 >first and is a good move, but not the best, the programme needs to see there >is better, then choose it. That is what we humans "Try" to do!;) > >Terry How quick you guys always are when it comes to "move X is better than move Y". What exactly is your proof that Bxg6 is any better than cxb5? How many moves to checkmate for Bxg6 and how many moves to checkmate for cxb5? Or how do you define "move X is better than move Y" again? Note: Please don't take this as a personal attack or something, because it's not. :) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.