Author: Tina Long
Date: 02:13:17 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 09:41:45, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 31, 2002 at 22:42:29, Tina Long wrote: > >>On March 31, 2002 at 11:00:42, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2002 at 00:24:31, Tina Long wrote: >>> >>>>I may be nieve to have such faith in Chess Grandmasters, but it is a much more >>>>pleasant life than to be constantly doubting the integrity of game match & >>>>tournament results. >>>> >>>>Tina Long >>> >>>So basicly what you say is it is much easier to believe in lies then in the >>>threuth. >> >>NO I DO NOT say that at all. >>IMO I belieive the truth. >> >>If you want to say that Grandmasters are Cheats who throw games for money then >>SAY IT MARC. Don't hide behind saying that I believe in Lies. >> >>>This maybe a fact but.. >>>Not an good argument. >> >>It is not a fact at all. >>My arguments defending Grandmaster's integrity were good arguments. >> >>What are your arguments that they cheat Marc? >> >>Tina Long >> >>Tina I don't think Mark explains himself well in English, so you can't be certain what he means? > >He says you want to believe in lies over truth even if it's a fact! That doesn't >make much sense, but I think he means you are putting "Blind Faith" that all is >above board, (no pun intended) that no funny business is _ever_ taking place, >and the stats are correct, regardless. > >He's just skeptical, if you put too much trust in _all_ GM's and the statistical >data. > >This I gather from his broken, English and that you don't have a solid case for >debate, wether you're right in your assertions or not. > >Does that make any sense?...Oh well... > >Regards, > Terry Marc has claimed in the past that some Grandmaster Matches - including Kasparov Kramnik - were fixed. When he's stated this in the past he's always left out great chunks of argument in the guise of "everybody knows" or "as I said before". When he said here "easier to believe in lies then in the threuth" he was referring to the fact that believing GM's have integrity is a lie. It's a Troll thread so I decided to challenge him. I'd really love to see his Proof that Kasparov - Kramnik was fixed. Cheers, Tina
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.