Author: Chris Carson
Date: 05:14:06 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2002 at 08:08:26, Chris Carson wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 22:50:38, Ratko V Tomic wrote: > >>> We saw how effective a 2700 GM was against Rebel after 100 >>> preparation games, two wins and two losses. >> >>I don't think the practice was with the the fully identical >>program version, opening book and settings. I was talking about >>having an equivalent of "GM at home" and not about a developer >>team providing new versions, new books, new settings... etc. >>That's why we keep upgrading or buying new programs or experiment >>with program parameters. The old ones wear out, they become >>relatively weaker against a given human after some play at fixed >>settings. > >Actually just book and settings is all that is required to change the way the >program plays and you get that at home. My play against humans dramatically >improves when I practice against a computer, my analysis more complete and I >have a better understanding of my own strengths and weakness. I might ad that I play 40/2 to improve my game and g/15 or g/30 when I want my best chance to score against a computer (or human for that matter).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.