Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 08:08:30 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2002 at 05:13:17, Tina Long wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 09:41:45, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 31, 2002 at 22:42:29, Tina Long wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2002 at 11:00:42, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>On March 31, 2002 at 00:24:31, Tina Long wrote: >>>> > >>>>>I may be nieve to have such faith in Chess Grandmasters, but it is a much more >>>>>pleasant life than to be constantly doubting the integrity of game match & >>>>>tournament results. >>>>> >>>>>Tina Long >>>> >>>>So basicly what you say is it is much easier to believe in lies then in the >>>>threuth. >>> >>>NO I DO NOT say that at all. >>>IMO I belieive the truth. >>> >>>If you want to say that Grandmasters are Cheats who throw games for money then >>>SAY IT MARC. Don't hide behind saying that I believe in Lies. >>> >>>>This maybe a fact but.. >>>>Not an good argument. >>> >>>It is not a fact at all. >>>My arguments defending Grandmaster's integrity were good arguments. >>> >>>What are your arguments that they cheat Marc? >>> >>>Tina Long >>> >>>Tina I don't think Mark explains himself well in English, so you can't be certain what he means? >> >>He says you want to believe in lies over truth even if it's a fact! That doesn't >>make much sense, but I think he means you are putting "Blind Faith" that all is >>above board, (no pun intended) that no funny business is _ever_ taking place, >>and the stats are correct, regardless. >> >>He's just skeptical, if you put too much trust in _all_ GM's and the statistical >>data. >> >>This I gather from his broken, English and that you don't have a solid case for >>debate, wether you're right in your assertions or not. >> >>Does that make any sense?...Oh well... >> >>Regards, >> Terry > >Marc has claimed in the past that some Grandmaster Matches - including Kasparov >Kramnik - were fixed. When he's stated this in the past he's always left out >great chunks of argument in the guise of "everybody knows" or "as I said >before". > >When he said here "easier to believe in lies then in the threuth" he was >referring to the fact that believing GM's have integrity is a lie. It's a Troll >thread so I decided to challenge him. I'd really love to see his Proof that >Kasparov - Kramnik was fixed. > >Cheers, >Tina ROTFL! Yes I'd like to see his evidence for Kasparov throwing the match, his _Ego_ would never let him do that! It was also Kasparov's _Ego_ IE (Breaking the Berlin Wall),along with personal problems at the time that he blew his match with Kramink, IMHO. Regards, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.