Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 11:25:12 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2002 at 12:36:23, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On April 02, 2002 at 11:52:52, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 18:20:11, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >> >>>I am not surprised, In fact that is what I said before. To be _well_ prepared >>>against computers you need a lot of time that will be wasted since they >>>play humans the rest of the year. >> >>Or perhaps some humans are weaker than some comps, tactically speaking of >>course...Chess is chess anyway, don't you think ? :) > >No, chess is not chess anyway. It depends a lot on who your opponent is, and >everybody knows it. Of course...I agree with you. But what about the comments of Gulko on great positional play of Hiarcs ? Don't you think that it passed (in that case) the Turing test ? Otello > >Miguel > >>w.b.r. >>Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.