Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question)

Author: Mike Hood

Date: 04:00:24 04/03/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 03, 2002 at 06:57:46, Michael Vox wrote:

>10^26 possible positions is not going to happen in our lifetimes, so why bother
>discussing the matter ?!

It's the Holy Grail.

Let's talk philosophy and forget the technicalities.

• Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Sune Fischer 04:07:03 04/03/02
  • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Daniel Clausen 05:14:02 04/03/02
    • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Sune Fischer 05:52:42 04/03/02
      • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Mike Hood 15:33:12 04/03/02
        • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Scott Gasch 18:42:33 04/03/02
          • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Daniel Clausen 23:17:21 04/03/02
            • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Roy Eassa 09:57:54 04/04/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.