Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question)

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 04:07:03 04/03/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 03, 2002 at 07:00:24, Mike Hood wrote:

>On April 03, 2002 at 06:57:46, Michael Vox wrote:
>
>>10^26 possible positions is not going to happen in our lifetimes, so why bother
>>discussing the matter ?!
>
>It's the Holy Grail.
>
>Let's talk philosophy and forget the technicalities.

Perhaps there is a shortcut, maybe we don't need to search the entire tree, all
we need is to invert a 64x64 matrix :)
I can't get it out of my head that it might be possible to solve the problem
mathematicly if we find the right model.
I don't really care about the solution, only about the solving process.

-S.

• Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Daniel Clausen 05:14:02 04/03/02
  • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Sune Fischer 05:52:42 04/03/02
    • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Mike Hood 15:33:12 04/03/02
      • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Scott Gasch 18:42:33 04/03/02
        • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Daniel Clausen 23:17:21 04/03/02
          • Re: 32-piece tablebases (Philosophical Question) Roy Eassa 09:57:54 04/04/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.