Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 05:52:42 04/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2002 at 08:14:02, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On April 03, 2002 at 07:07:03, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>Perhaps there is a shortcut, maybe we don't need to search the entire tree, all >>we need is to invert a 64x64 matrix :) >>I can't get it out of my head that it might be possible to solve the problem >>mathematicly if we find the right model. > >Well, mathematically, chess is solved. The compression algorithm is also very >efficient - it's the rules of the game of chess. It's just that usually the >decompression takes quite some time. > >:) > > >Sargon Ah, but is like saying we understand everything about turbulence just because we know some stochastics of how the molecules interact :) I guess here the positional play is macro canonial behavior and tactics is micro canonial :) Perhaps it is provably unsolvable, a three body problem of game theory! Even so, pertubation theory should tell us something, LOL. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.