Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 11:26:11 04/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2002 at 01:13:31, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote: >>> >>>>thanks in advance! >>> >>>I did not have time enough to test it very much >> >>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0 >> >> >>April fool ?. >> >>Sarah. > >Well, believe it or not after seeing/analysing something like 20000 computer >games and even more human games in more than 20 years and knowing most of the >programs which have been available and very many experimenthal verions that have >been made since 1976 I usually able to see if a program is stronger and how much >in a few games. >This is because I know what they do not know and what they and when their >evaluation is wrong and why. >However before stating something I prefer to have test games results also. > >Maybe I will not be able to do it in the future, but so far I was able to. > >Sandro Hi! I am sorry but it is absolutely impossible to notice 15-20 elo points differences between two programs without several houndred games, maybee if one version is x% faster than the previuous (without any other changess) We see this all the time here when GMs and other "experts" judge a program after one or two games. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.