Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:08:32 04/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2002 at 09:04:59, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 01, 2002 at 08:52:31, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 02:39:34, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>thanks in advance! >>>>> >>>>>I did not have time enough to test it very much >>>> >>>>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0 >>>> >>>> >>>>April fool ?. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>I know that the date is 1.4 but I see no reason to suspect this post. >>> >>>I can suspect if I read that the new version is 100 elo better but >>>a claim about 15-20 elo improvement that is only an impression is >>>not something that seems to be related with 1.4. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Tell me Uri, what's it take to be left with an impression of a 15-20 point >>improvement?. >> >>Sarah. > >Suppose that I correct a bug in my program. That wasn't stated as the case. >suppose that I see in tests that the new version >gets a score of 11.5-10.5 against the old version. That means about as much as not playing any games. >I can say in this case that my impression is that >the new version is 15-20 elo better than the old version but >I do not have enough games to be sure. Then I'd say you also think it's April fools day. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.