Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 03:53:15 04/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2002 at 14:26:11, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On April 03, 2002 at 01:13:31, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote: >>>> >>>>>thanks in advance! >>>> >>>>I did not have time enough to test it very much >>> >>>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0 >>> >>> >>>April fool ?. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Well, believe it or not after seeing/analysing something like 20000 computer >>games and even more human games in more than 20 years and knowing most of the >>programs which have been available and very many experimenthal verions that have >>been made since 1976 I usually able to see if a program is stronger and how much >>in a few games. >>This is because I know what they do not know and what they and when their >>evaluation is wrong and why. >>However before stating something I prefer to have test games results also. >> >>Maybe I will not be able to do it in the future, but so far I was able to. >> >>Sandro > >Hi! > >I am sorry but it is absolutely impossible to notice 15-20 elo points >differences between two programs without several houndred games, maybee if one >version is x% faster than the previuous (without any other changess) > >We see this all the time here when GMs and other "experts" judge a program after > one or two games. Hi Bertil, I am sorry too, but it is possible. Sandro > >Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.