Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6?

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 11:14:51 04/04/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 01, 2002 at 02:03:15, Chessfun wrote:

>On April 01, 2002 at 01:55:29, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On March 31, 2002 at 16:46:42, liam hearns wrote:
>>
>>>thanks in advance!
>>
>>I did not have time enough to test it very much
>
>>, but I got the impression it is about 15 to 20 points stronger than 6.0
>
>
>April fool ?.

Lack of fantasy?

Of course if a good programmer works on the engine and is able to improve some
parts of the engine the result is a stronger engine.

Isn't the same in USA?

Sorry I forgot you like more marks ??

Sandro
>
>Sarah.

• Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 15:03:23 04/04/02
  • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Thorsten Czub 02:44:09 04/05/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 05:08:58 04/05/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 03:05:26 04/05/02
      • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Thorsten Czub 03:44:42 04/05/02
        • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 05:00:55 04/05/02
  • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Sandro Necchi 22:15:25 04/04/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 23:13:26 04/04/02
      • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Sandro Necchi 09:25:44 04/05/02
        • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Roy Eassa 10:18:48 04/05/02
        • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 09:57:28 04/05/02
          • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Sandro Necchi 22:31:33 04/05/02
• Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Roy Eassa 12:16:17 04/04/02
  • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Sandro Necchi 22:17:49 04/04/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.