Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6?

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 02:44:09 04/05/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 04, 2002 at 18:03:23, Chessfun wrote:
>No, I simply like data that supports claims.
>
>Sarah.

how do you want to find out this when you always do blitz shit ?

this way you will never find out anything.

play 40/120 games, and you see the difference.


also, you wanted data:


[Event "1.Ne3 !"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "??.??.????"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Player"]
[Black "CENTURY 4.0"]
[Result "*"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[FEN "3rr1k1/3n1p2/p5bp/1pRP2p1/1P6/1P3PPq/1B3Q1P/R4NK1 w - - 0 1"]

*


Building 2 connected passed pawns, middlegame.

AMD C-1200 mhz:

Fritz7                             0"
Quark "Paderborn"                  2.6"
Chinito6                           3"
Gandalf5.1                         5"
CM 8777                           18"  AMD A1500
ChessTiger14.6                    28"
Rebel Century4                  1'17"
Yace Yace 0.99.X                1'21" AMD A1600@1533
The King3.12d                   2'10"
Rebel Century4 Macheide         3'45"
Little Goliath 2000 v3.5c      11'36"  AMD 1400@1466 / 256MB Hash
Gromit 3.10.16                 21'38"
Shredder6 Paderborn            36'16"
Crafty18.13                     ----   not in 32'
Shredder6                       ----   not in 2h30'

Others ??

• Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Chessfun 05:08:58 04/05/02
• Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 03:05:26 04/05/02
  • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Thorsten Czub 03:44:42 04/05/02
    • Re: is shr.paderborn an improvement on s6? Uri Blass 05:00:55 04/05/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.