Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 13:04:33 04/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2002 at 15:36:32, Roy Eassa wrote: >On April 05, 2002 at 15:17:35, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On April 05, 2002 at 13:37:14, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>What about this: >>> >>>[d] 2r1k2r/p2nnp2/1p2p2p/3pP3/b2P2p1/PNqB2B1/2P2PPP/2RQR1K1 b k - 0 17 >>> >>>18...Bxb3 19.cxb3 Qxd4 (e.g.: 20.Rxc8+ Nxc8 21.Re2 Ne7 22.Rc2 Kd8) >>> >>>instead of 18...h5, which was played? >> >> >> Emanuel didn't like 20.Rxc8+ Nxc8 21.Qc2 Qc5 22.Qb2 with the idea Rc1,Bb5 >> or 21.-Ne7 22.Bb5 Qc5 23.Qd3 "and black will almost be crucified." >> > >In the second variation you mention, Fritz thinks 21...Ne7 is a blunder and >loses to 22.b4. > >In any case, I'm way over my head here! Thanks for a strong response to a weak >player's question. The whole setup from black was very interesting but extremly risky. He actually played against the white pawns on a3,c2,d4 - but later in the game found out that the takings on a3 or d4 were full of poison. Too late then with a position full of weak squares and two mighty white bishops. Fritz's c4!! was a killer... Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.