Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz is holding Berg Nicely!!

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 18:49:51 04/05/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 05, 2002 at 21:33:22, Jerry Doby wrote:

>Mr. Berg is a legitamate 2500 elo player and fritz is winning the match, I have
>yet to see a bad computer result vs humans, yet some people stubbornly hold on
>to the nonsense that computers are not 2500 elo????? Barbaric ignorance I would
>say for sure!!!


I guess you're referring to Dr. Hyatt? I believe he said that computers and this
was some weeks back, may be at the 2500 level.

What's "Barbaric Ignorance" is posting trolls like this to make a pathetic
attempt to flame people who know a hell of alot more than you ever will!

So when you watch Kramnik Fry Fritz, then what will you say?  Of course Kramnik
is 2800 and has plenty of time to prepare so you'll say "Of course he won it was
unfair for the computer!":o))

TM

• Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Tanya Deborah 23:05:40 04/05/02
  • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Michael Vox 03:44:37 04/06/02
    • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Terry McCracken 14:02:59 04/06/02
  • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Terry McCracken 23:53:48 04/05/02
    • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 pavel 00:12:29 04/06/02
      • Re: Wise words, Pavel ;) (NT) Otello Gnaramori 07:06:25 04/06/02
  • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Jerry Doby 23:26:59 04/05/02
    • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Jonas Cohonas 02:32:16 04/06/02
      • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Terry McCracken 13:54:28 04/06/02
    • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Tanya Deborah 23:49:55 04/05/02
      • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Sune Fischer 02:03:29 04/06/02
        • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Otello Gnaramori 07:31:06 04/06/02
          • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Sune Fischer 08:11:08 04/06/02
            • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Uri Blass 08:44:48 04/06/02
              • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Sune Fischer 09:33:25 04/06/02
                • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Uri Blass 11:01:39 04/06/02
        • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Uri Blass 04:48:29 04/06/02
          • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Sune Fischer 05:45:52 04/06/02
      • Re: Computers are definitely better that 2500 elo. I could say 2600-2650 Terry McCracken 00:02:38 04/06/02
• Re: Fritz is holding Berg Nicely!! Jerry Doby 20:37:45 04/05/02
  • So much for AOL taking action pavel 20:40:35 04/05/02
    • Re: So much for AOL taking action Lyn Harper 23:45:28 04/05/02
      • Re: So much for AOL taking action Jonas Cohonas 02:36:16 04/06/02
        • Re: So much for AOL taking action Jeroen van Dorp 10:49:13 04/06/02
          • Re: So much for AOL taking action Jonas Cohonas 17:15:24 04/06/02
          • Re: So much for AOL taking action pavel 13:48:54 04/06/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.