Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:52:44 04/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2002 at 16:58:19, Steve Maughan wrote: >Jorge, > >>Take a look at Doctor? 3.0 estimated rating: >> >>http://home.wish.net/~pijltjes/html/cbranking.html > >Hmmm, a strange list IMO. The weaker engines seem to have estimated playing >strengths way above other lists e.g. IMO Faile 1.4.4 is not >2200 ELO - I would >say 1900 ELO. Nevertheless, I know that Doctor?3 is quite strong and CTP has >done well to beat it. > >Steve 1)I know no list when faile is 1900 and it seems to be at least 2100 elo based on other computer rating lists that I know. 2)The rating is not based on a big number of games and the target of it was simply to estimate the level of the baron versions. 3)doctor3 is better than faile but it is certainly clearly weaker than the top programs. The difference between doctor3 and palm tiger is not so big to see one game that palm tiger beated doctor as a big surprise. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.