Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IM Berg 2500 - Fritz 7.006 Game 2

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 00:23:37 04/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 06, 2002 at 02:15:06, Tanya Deborah wrote:

>On April 05, 2002 at 13:55:43, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>
>
>Hi Sune!!
>
>Great games! Thank you very much.
>
>Could you please tell me how many games they will play??? And what is the
>hardware that u are using in this match?


 Hi Tanya,

 The hardware is about the same as Tiger had in the Argentine -
 PIII 800 - 256 Mb hash. Right now we are talking about something
 like 8 games - then we'll see. Emanuel is rather free from tournament
 play 1-2 months now. Next weekend he's going to play in the Bundesliga
 but that's just 2 games.


>
>Do you think that Fritz 7 is the best chess program????


 I'm not sure. Best on the SSDF list - and creating most problems
 for humans, are two different things. But it looks like Franz Morsch
 has done a great job with Fritz 7.006. We chose Fritz this time because
 Emanuel has already played 4 games vs Tiger (2.5-1.5 for E), and there
 was no interest from Christoph in trying out the new Tiger against him ;-)
 So we turned to Fritz because of the good results seen in the SSDF, Utzinger
 tournament etc. Also we looked at it as an interesting sort of pre-match
 before Kramnik-Fritz. These games are thought as training for Emanuel.
 He's playing his ordinary game and might try some experiments in the
 openings. Just like in the 1st game, which provided good material for
 further analysis how to handle the black side. I think we will see much
 more of anti-computer chess in Smirin-computers and Kramnik-Fritz.
 Btw, we are starting the 3rd game Berg - Fritz7 in 40 minutes ;-)

 Sune


>
>Thanks in advance Sune!
>
>Best Regards!
>Tanya Deborah.
>
>
>
>
>>The second game was a Petroff. Actually the first time Emanuel faced this
>>opening in a tournament level game. (Except for one game played in a small
>>tournament several years ago, when E chose 3.Nc3). Making it into one of
>>the side lines, E sacrificed a pawn - actually played once by Arakhamia Grant
>>in 1994. Fritz saw nothing better than returning the pawn, resulting in an
>>ending RRB vs RRN. Black slowly got worse and drifted into an almost zugzwang
>>position. Emanuel probably missed the win somewhere, maybe in move 46 and the
>>result was a draw.
>>
>>During this game we had some syncronizing problems, due to having some coffee
>>and not hearing the moves played by Fritz...;-) But we followed the ordinary
>>clock beside the board. Here's the game which surely will inspire E to
>>prepare something for the Petroff...
>>
>>
>>[Event "Emanuel 120'"]
>>[Site "Kil"]
>>[Date "2002.04.05"]
>>[Round "2"]
>>[White "Berg, Emanuel"]
>>[Black "Fritz 7"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[ECO "C42"]
>>[WhiteElo "2500"]
>>[PlyCount "131"]
>>[EventDate "2002.??.??"]
>>
>>{256MB, Fritz7.ctg, PIII 800} 1. e4 {0} 1... e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {21} 2... Nf6 {
>>0 First time Petroff for Emanuel...} 3. Nxe5 {85} 3... d6 {0} 4. Nf3 {14} 4...
>>Nxe4 {0} 5. d4 {13} 5... d5 {0} 6. Bd3 {22} 6... Be7 {0} 7. O-O {34} 7... Nc6 {
>>0} 8. c4 {(Te1) 42} 8... Nb4 {0} 9. Be2 {15} 9... O-O {0} 10. Nc3 {119} 10...
>>Be6 {0} 11. Bf4 {(Le3) 224} 11... c5 {0} 12. dxc5 {171} 12... Bxc5 {0} 13. Na4
>>$5 {(Sxc3) 416 A pawn sacrifice - actually played before by Arakhamia Grant vs
>>Polgar 1/2-1/2 1994.} 13... dxc4 {-0.31/13 285 Polgar played 13.-Be7} 14. Nxc5
>>{33} 14... Qxd1 {-0.47/13 47} 15. Rfxd1 {39} 15... Nxc5 {-0.31/14 78} 16. Bd6 {
>>79} 16... Rfc8 {-0.31/14 74} 17. Nd4 {601} 17... Nbd3 {
>>-0.16/15 0 Black finds nothing better than to return the pawn} 18. Nxe6 {
>>(b3) 127 18.b3 was an alternative} 18... Nxe6 {-0.28/15 105} 19. Bxd3 {106}
>>19... cxd3 {-0.25/16 0} 20. Rxd3 {12} 20... Rc2 {-0.16/16 369} 21. Be5 {(b4) 86
>>} 21... f6 {-0.38/15 256 Fritz thinks he's better here, but Emanuel was
>>optimistic and saw some options with bishop vs knight and pawns on both flanks.
>>First white has to solve some minor problems though.} 22. Bc3 {44} 22... Rc8 {
>>-0.28/15 249} 23. Rad1 {(Kf1) 168} 23... Nc5 {-0.22/14 200} 24. Rd4 {(Td2) 461}
>>24... b5 {-0.19/15 264} 25. h4 $1 {(h3) 814} 25... a6 {-0.16/14 173} 26. Bb4 {
>>(T1d2) 902} 26... Ne6 {-0.19/14 272} 27. Re4 {(Td6) 170} 27... Rc1 $1 {
>>-0.47/14 122} 28. Ree1 {(Te1) 60} 28... Rxd1 {-0.25/15 102} 29. Rxd1 {51} 29...
>>Rc4 {-0.22/15 45} 30. a3 {61} 30... Rd4 {-0.25/15 35} 31. Re1 {(Txd4) 260}
>>31... Kf7 {-0.28/16 196} 32. g3 {(h5) 9} 32... g6 {-0.22/15 239} 33. Kg2 {
>>(Td3) 35} 33... h6 {-0.22/15 102} 34. Rc1 {(Te3) 163} 34... Rc4 {-0.09/16 102
>>White will now get his bishop vs knight ending, but it's a long way to go...}
>>35. Rxc4 {(Td1) 209} 35... bxc4 {-0.41/16 31} 36. Kf3 {6} 36... f5 {
>>-0.16/17 138} 37. Ke3 {88} 37... Kf6 {-0.19/17 58} 38. Bd6 {594} 38... g5 {
>>0.19/18 0 Emanuel: "Black is defending well. The ending is not clear."} 39. h5
>>$1 {(a4) 413} 39... Kf7 {0.09/17 98} 40. f3 {(Le5) 230} 40... Kf6 {-0.03/16 71}
>>41. g4 {(g4) 73 Black is slowly approaching a sort of zugzwang position.} 41...
>>a5 {0.00/17 78} 42. a4 {(Sd4) 30} 42... Kf7 {1.06/18 71} 43. gxf5 {
>>60 White now has clear winning chances.} 43... Ng7 {1.19/19 0} 44. Bc7 {30}
>>44... Nxh5 {1.19/18 0} 45. Bxa5 {32} 45... Ng3 {1.28/18 104} 46. Bc7 $6 {
>>(Kd4) 106  46.Kd4 looks better.} 46... Nxf5+ {1.00/17 59} 47. Ke4 {(Ke6) 59}
>>47... Ke6 {1.16/19 0} 48. Bb8 {(Lh2) 103} 48... Ne7 {0.56/18 102} 49. f4 {
>>(a5) 108} 49... gxf4 {0.44/17 85} 50. Bxf4 {12} 50... c3 $1 {
>>0.34/20 0 Black manages to save the draw} 51. b3 {(bxc3) 133} 51... h5 {
>>0.00/19 74} 52. a5 {(Kd3) 78} 52... c2 {-0.56/17 55} 53. a6 {45} 53... Nc6 {
>>-0.44/17 60} 54. b4 {(Kd6) 46} 54... h4 {-0.50/16 61} 55. b5 {(Le3) 18} 55...
>>h3 {-0.53/17 118} 56. Kf3 {20} 56... Nd4+ {-0.63/16 61} 57. Kf2 {6} 57... Nxb5
>>{-0.34/16 65} 58. Kg3 {4} 58... Kf5 {-0.16/17 39} 59. Bc1 {4} 59... Ke4 {
>>-0.03/20 82} 60. Kxh3 {17} 60... Kf3 {-0.16/20 46} 61. Kh4 {28} 61... Na7 {
>>0.00/19 29} 62. Kg5 {18} 62... Ke4 {0.00/18 16} 63. Kg4 {(Kf6) 8} 63... Kd4 {
>>0.00/19 33} 64. Kf3 {(Kf4) 6} 64... Kd3 {0.00/20 63} 65. Kf2 {8} 65... Kc4 {
>>0.00/21 35} 66. Ke2 {(Ke3) 5} 1/2-1/2
>>
>>Sune



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.