Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 00:55:44 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
Uri, >1)I know no list when faile is 1900 and it seems to be at least 2100 elo based >on other computer rating lists that I know. Lars list has it 200 ELO below Monarch and I know that even early versions of Monarch beat Faile easily. Monarch isn't >2100 ELO so I *really* doubt that Faile is >2000 ELO. >3)doctor3 is better than faile but it is certainly clearly weaker than the top >programs. Sure. >The difference between doctor3 and palm tiger is not so big to see one game >that palm tiger beated doctor as a big surprise. I agree but I still think it's amazing considering the speed difference. Regards, Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.