Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:42:05 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2002 at 03:55:44, Steve Maughan wrote: >Uri, > >>1)I know no list when faile is 1900 and it seems to be at least 2100 elo based >>on other computer rating lists that I know. > >Lars list has it 200 ELO below Monarch and I know that even early versions of >Monarch beat Faile easily. Monarch isn't >2100 ELO so I *really* doubt that >Faile is >2000 ELO. Maybe you are wrong about your estimate for monarch's strength. I am not sure that it is not >2100 elo. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.