Author: Michael Vox
Date: 03:44:37 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
Dr. Hyatt is incorrect and Deborah is correct. It is obvious on a 1.2 ghz or stronger that programs are over 2500 and probably over 2600. FIDE should allow Fritz to participate in human FIDE tournaments for a year to determine an accurate rating. It would be good advertising for everyone involved. On April 06, 2002 at 02:05:40, Tanya Deborah wrote: >On April 05, 2002 at 21:49:51, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On April 05, 2002 at 21:33:22, Jerry Doby wrote: >> >>>Mr. Berg is a legitamate 2500 elo player and fritz is winning the match, I have >>>yet to see a bad computer result vs humans, yet some people stubbornly hold on >>>to the nonsense that computers are not 2500 elo????? Barbaric ignorance I would >>>say for sure!!! >> >> >>I guess you're referring to Dr. Hyatt? I believe he said that computers and this >>was some weeks back, may be at the 2500 level. > > >I do not think that Jerry is reffering to Dr. Hyatt. He has the free opinion to >talk about it (meanwhile do not insult anybody) and I also believe that some >people here do not want to understand that computers played at GM Level. Best >computers programs play definitely at 2600-2650 elo level. Why people can´t >understant it?????? > >I don´t think that a 2450 player can get a second place, in the Dutch >Tournament. (Fritz got it) > >I don´t think that a 2450 player can beat Van Wely two times, in a four game >match. (Rebel 4 did it!) > >I don´t think that a 2450 player can get same great results that Junior got in >the Dortmund Tournament some time ago. It got an elo of 2701!!!!(slow time!!) > >a 2450 player can´t beat Gulko in the same way that new programs dit it! > >AND I AM SURE THAT a 2450 player CAN´T TAKE THE FIRST PLACE, IN THE SAME WAY >THAT THE AMAZING CHESS TIGER 14 DID IN ARGENTINA!. > >There are many results that prove that today computer programs are indeed >superior to 2500 elo against humans. Why. Why is so difficult to understand to >some persons here ?????????? > >Do you need that Fritz beats 8-0 to Kramnik to think that computers are clearly >better that 2500 ????????????? :-) > >Best Regards! > >Tanya Deborah. > > > >> >>What's "Barbaric Ignorance" is posting trolls like this to make a pathetic >>attempt to flame people who know a hell of alot more than you ever will! >> >>So when you watch Kramnik Fry Fritz, then what will you say? Of course Kramnik >>is 2800 and has plenty of time to prepare so you'll say "Of course he won it was >>unfair for the computer!":o)) >> >>TM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.