Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 07:06:25 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2002 at 03:12:29, pavel wrote: >Common Belief: > >When a Computer programs win against Strong GM, then GM doesnt know how to play >a computer. >When a GM beats a Computer, "See how GM trashes chess programs?" > >When a computer program beats GM, then "GM didnt have enough experience playing >that perticular chess program", oh yeah! and the chess program knows this GM >bone to bone. > >When a computer program doesnt "understand" a position, "see this program doesnt >even understand this position, how can you even compare them with GMs?" >When GMs makes the most unthinkable mistake, which a patzer would recongnize, >then we say. "Oh, he was just tired." > >I guess Tanya was right, we need to see a match where Fritz beats hell out of >Kramnik (8-0), to say that chess programs are stronger than we give credit to >them for. Then again, we might come with other excuses. > >(ie, kasparov lost to DB because he was going through a personal crisis, no >wait, someone beind the curtain who happens to be a group of strong GM was >making some move. But again the moves those were too good was made by those Gm >and the other moves which were below average standard, where made by the >computer.) > >Excuses excuses! > >pavs;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.