Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 19:55:19 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2002 at 22:36:00, pavel wrote: >On April 06, 2002 at 22:27:24, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 06, 2002 at 22:13:17, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 06, 2002 at 21:43:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>SJeng 12.11 is playing without TB to make it fair since Chess Tiger 14.9 doesn't >>>>use TB. Even with TB SJeng would have lost this game regardless. Uri is right >>>>this SJeng is a tought opponent with an estimated rating by its author close to >>>>2400 in standard time control.2. What is Sjeng's status ? >>>> >>>>PS: Simply consider this a Pearl of a game, Simply an Amazing Performance! >>>> >>>> >>>>It has successfully beaten players rated over 2500 points, including several >>>>titled GM's and IM's. One version of Sjeng even attained the first place in the >>>>crazyhouse players list on the Internet Chess Club (ICC), and the first place on >>>>the Free Internet Chess Server (FICS). Its crazyhouse rating currently >>>>fluctuates around 2300 points. >>>>Sjeng is probably a bit weaker in bughouse than it is in crazyhouse. Most >>>>Sjeng's on the FICS have a rating of about 2000 points in bughouse, with a top >>>>of over 2200 points. >>>> >>>>For standard chess, Sjeng's rating is probably about 2400 ELO. In suicide and >>>>losers chess Sjeng beats all but the very best humans, and will beat >>>>non-specialized programs easily. >>> >>>It seems strange to me that sjeng gets only depth 4 or 5. >>>I know that we cannot compare depthes of different programs but >>>programs usually get bigger depths and even the weak movei on celeron gets >>>usually depth 7-9 at that time control. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I can add that sjeng can search clearly deeper in the middle game based on the >>following post. >> >>http://www.it.ro/ccc_search/ccc.php?art_id=198392 >> >>I know that the hardware is better and that sjeng is an older version and the >>positions are different but still sjeng could get depth 8 in a few seconds. >> >>I suspect that your celeron was slowed down by a significant factor so sjeng did >>not enjoy from a significant speed advantage that the celeron should give it. >> >>Uri > >At this time control (40/40) the depth does seem very odd, even for the most >slowest program out there. At this depth, not is it right to compare sjeng with >CTP 14.9, Sjeng actually more crippled than CTP in a handheld. > >pavs I downloaded the SJeng v12.11 now what version do you suggest?; there doesn't seems to be nothing wrong with my Celeron since it is the same one that I have been using with Movei From Uri, Bestia, Faile, and Gaviota. If you can suggest the best version of SJeng then I will use it. Just give me the website where I can find the best Version. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.