Author: pavel
Date: 20:09:16 04/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2002 at 22:55:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 06, 2002 at 22:36:00, pavel wrote: > >>On April 06, 2002 at 22:27:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 06, 2002 at 22:13:17, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On April 06, 2002 at 21:43:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>SJeng 12.11 is playing without TB to make it fair since Chess Tiger 14.9 doesn't >>>>>use TB. Even with TB SJeng would have lost this game regardless. Uri is right >>>>>this SJeng is a tought opponent with an estimated rating by its author close to >>>>>2400 in standard time control.2. What is Sjeng's status ? >>>>> >>>>>PS: Simply consider this a Pearl of a game, Simply an Amazing Performance! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It has successfully beaten players rated over 2500 points, including several >>>>>titled GM's and IM's. One version of Sjeng even attained the first place in the >>>>>crazyhouse players list on the Internet Chess Club (ICC), and the first place on >>>>>the Free Internet Chess Server (FICS). Its crazyhouse rating currently >>>>>fluctuates around 2300 points. >>>>>Sjeng is probably a bit weaker in bughouse than it is in crazyhouse. Most >>>>>Sjeng's on the FICS have a rating of about 2000 points in bughouse, with a top >>>>>of over 2200 points. >>>>> >>>>>For standard chess, Sjeng's rating is probably about 2400 ELO. In suicide and >>>>>losers chess Sjeng beats all but the very best humans, and will beat >>>>>non-specialized programs easily. >>>> >>>>It seems strange to me that sjeng gets only depth 4 or 5. >>>>I know that we cannot compare depthes of different programs but >>>>programs usually get bigger depths and even the weak movei on celeron gets >>>>usually depth 7-9 at that time control. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I can add that sjeng can search clearly deeper in the middle game based on the >>>following post. >>> >>>http://www.it.ro/ccc_search/ccc.php?art_id=198392 >>> >>>I know that the hardware is better and that sjeng is an older version and the >>>positions are different but still sjeng could get depth 8 in a few seconds. >>> >>>I suspect that your celeron was slowed down by a significant factor so sjeng did >>>not enjoy from a significant speed advantage that the celeron should give it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>At this time control (40/40) the depth does seem very odd, even for the most >>slowest program out there. At this depth, not is it right to compare sjeng with >>CTP 14.9, Sjeng actually more crippled than CTP in a handheld. >> >>pavs > >I downloaded the SJeng v12.11 now what version do you suggest?; there doesn't >seems to be nothing wrong with my Celeron since it is the same one that I have >been using with Movei From Uri, Bestia, Faile, and Gaviota. If you can suggest >the best version of SJeng then I will use it. Just give me the website where I >can find the best Version. > >Pichard. I wont suggest anything, because you are using the latest version. Still one doesnt need to be a genius to find out that sjeng was crippled in this match, whats your opinion about sjeng only searcing 4/5 depths in average? There is something wrong with the game setup, check your computer again. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.