Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:26:04 04/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2002 at 07:02:09, Alain Lyrette wrote: > >On April 07, 2002 at 06:02:47, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 07, 2002 at 05:55:38, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>This indicates very strongly that Genius on ipac is best thing available by way >>>of handheld. >>>S.Taylor >> >>No >>It indicates nothing because the pam ran only with 28 mhz. >> >>Uri >28 or 54mhz is irrelevant.As of now even if you push a palm to it's pathetic >limits,it's no match for an ipaq running at 206 mhz.Chess Tiger is a much better >program than Genius and yet,in a match,it will lose badly if Genius runs on the >strongarm.When the palms switch from that prehistoric processor to a real cpu >sometime in Q4 it will be another story.But for RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW no >palm, however cute they are, can touch an ipaq.The difference in sheer power is >just too huge window CE or not.S.Taylor is right.....for now.Désolé Christophe ! I disagree with you, my friend has an Ipaq running at 206 mhz and according to him in a recent match between Genius and PockeGrandmaster of 50 games that took him a couple of weeks at G/90 minutes Pocket-GM won W20 L17 D13. Plus you have took consider that a palm overclocked to 54 Mhz gain at leat between 50-70 points and the CTP 14.9 palm running at 28 Mhz had two draws against Pocket-GM. The only part that I agree with you is when you stated "when the palms switch from that prehistoric processor to a real cpu sometime in Q4 it will be another story." I simply say that it will be at least be 180 points stronger. Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.