Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:29:09 04/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2002 at 13:20:22, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 07, 2002 at 13:10:41, Rafael Vasquez wrote: > >>On April 07, 2002 at 10:37:56, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>-sniped >>>Finally, I also overclocked my Handspring Visor >>>Prism to 54 Mhz >>-sniped >> >>Hello Jorge, >> >>I'm happy to see you are enjoying the advantages of overclocking Chess Tiger >> >>Rafael > > > >Finally!!!! > >I don't see the point to play at a reduced speed when all Palms can run much >faster than the default speed. > >Especially if you let Tiger Palm play against PC programs running a zillion >times faster! > >(I'm no masochist) I do not see what you lose from seeing palm tiger beating often pc programs that are zillion times faster. I agree that inspite of the result sjeng is too strong for the default speed but sjeng is better than a lot of programs and it seems that for weak programs being zillion times faster is not enough to get 50% and they need to be some zillions times faster. If people see that the palm tiger is better than a PC program then it is natural if they want to underclock the palm or improve the hardware of the loser for more games. If people see that palm tiger is worse than the PC program then they want to improve the speed of the palm for more games. I do not think that it is something against you. In the case of sjeng I still expect sjeng to win a match thanks to the better hardware inspite of the fact that the palm does not run in reduced speed and it is too early to give sjeng better hardware but if we see that sjeng is losing again and again then I may change my opinion. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.