Author: stuart taylor
Date: 01:14:31 04/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2002 at 23:20:45, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 08, 2002 at 22:13:06, stuart taylor wrote: > >>One also might be enough. >>But It's much more than 6 anyway. It's 6 each against each. >>I agree that if it is close, It's no proof. But it's no proof that not, either. >>And if it's not so close, It's quite suggestive. >>S.Taylor > > > >Even 6-0 would say almost nothing. > >We are talking about these statistical things night and day on CCC. You should >know better. > > > > Christophe So can handhelds EVER be tested? And perhaps ChessGenius for Palm is as good as anything else, or better! ["I should know better? But It's not an easy pill to swallow. I keep thinking that with an ingenious way of intelligent testing and/or analyzing the games, it shouldn't have to go only the long, extreme and drastic way.(Or else nothing at all to talk about].[It also takes some of the interest out of chess, to say that you cannot judge from quality of play etc.(and that the quality should have little to do with the results, except by the hundreds of games]. And does everyone agree that with humans It's NOT necesary? (as much) Thanks for your patience!!! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.