Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 02:10:51 04/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2002 at 04:40:41, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On April 08, 2002 at 18:49:22, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>The point about negative being good for black isn't universal. For my program >>(and I think some others) a positive score is good for the side whose turn it >>is. So if it's Black's turn and the score is -10.77 in my program that would >>mean that White is winning by about a Queen. > >Concerning ICC: Kiwipete (you know, the guy with that famous movegeneration test >position :) solved it nicely by saying "+whatever by white/black". It's clear >for everyone and it's trivial to implement... I don't know why no-one else uses >this scheme (afaik). Sinan (my chess engine) will definitely use this (hopefully >not copyrighted) scheme when whispering eval on ICC. Of course it will be a >ridiculous eval, but at least everyone will know for which side it is. :) > >Or I could use + for side to move, when it's the engine's move, + for white when >in analyzing mode - except on Tuesday and Friday afternoon. :) > >Sargon Yeah, I like Pete's scheme as well. When will sinan be on ICC? Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.