Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 14:41:54 04/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2002 at 17:24:22, Chessfun wrote: >On April 09, 2002 at 13:39:15, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 09, 2002 at 13:17:42, Shay Bushinsky wrote: >> >>>http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=20898&p_docLang=EN >> >> >>Mr. Smirin said : >> >>"In my opinion they are extremely strong, I’d say about 2700 or even higher. I >>don’t see a big difference between the programs, although I’m pretty sure all of >>them have their stronger and weaker sides" >> >>That's quite interesting...Kramnik indicates Fritz at 2800+ , Smirin indicates >>that comps are now 2700+ >> >>The above judgements are coming in order from nr. 2 and nr. 15 of Chess World >>ranking...not exactly patzers. > > >I seriously doubt a persons chess ability means they automatically qualify to >judge how strong computers play. Yes, but they can compare comps strength to other known players including themselves. For all you know he hasn't played a program in >years and as you wrote elsewhere; >"I'm wondering on his opinion about nowadays computer's elo of 2700+ is based on >what?" > My guess was that Smirin tested "probably" the newest programs at home or probably was analyzing the more recent games of comps. vs. humans, to justify his claim , since the latest match of him vs. comps was on 1996. > >>In this forum "experts" said at the best between 2500 and 2600. > > >Does that meam that you consider Kramnik and Smirin "experts"? apparently not >based on your above comment. > >Sarah. They are surely authorities in chess and I deeply respect their opinion, that actually diverge quite a bit from the best elo evaluations regarding comps. posted here. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.